My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — actual money, no paper trading — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I've zero copiers despite metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot because I genuinely want suggestions, not validation.

The technique is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that routinely halts new purchase orders throughout sharp drops to protect capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency causes.

90-day stay results:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Price: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days green

The thing I find most fascinating in that equity curve is the March–April interval. You'll be able to see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might with none guide intervention. The circuit breaker did exactly what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.zero is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively strategy. Most retail algo merchants I see posting listed here are proud of 0.7–zero.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a reside account with actual slippage and costs.

And yet — Binance's copy buying and selling algorithm buries me because my lead stability is ~$618. Merchants with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two issues I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a approach to make risk-adjusted metrics extra visible to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there anything that may make you personally hesitant to copy this, that I'm not seeing from the inside?

Respect trustworthy takes.